California School News January 2018 : Page 5

5 Second General Session: Diane Ravitch DIANE RAVITCH is the nation’s leading advocate for public education. A renowned writer and research professor of education at NYU, Ravitch has published more than 500 articles and reviews for scholarly and popular publications. The Second General Session featured education historian, advocate and researcher Diane Ravitch. The fiery 78-year-old has enjoyed a long career in education and began her speech with a dire warning: “Public schools in California and the nation are at an existential crisis. The accountability system is broken and outside interests threaten the public school system.” Ravitch walked the crowd through the history of education in the United States. “What is the purpose of public schools?” she asked. “From the beginning of their history, and until recently, their pur-pose was to develop good citizens, to nurture good character, to procure young men and women to sustain our democratic experi-ment into the future.” She emphasized the role of public education in cultivating good citizens — young adults who can read and inform themselves about issues vote wisely for the nation’s leaders, lead independent lives, contribute to their communities and serve on juries. “But now education only focuses on one thing: test scores,” Ravitch stated. Beginning with the Bush administration’s No Child Left Behind policy, test scores have become the sole focus of schools, she argued. Ravitch explained how NCLB set unattainable goals, caused the closure of too many struggling schools that just needed extra help and contrib-uted to the explosion of the charter school industry. She posited that the Obama administration’s Race to the Top initiative only perpetuated the problem. Ravitch pointed out that the focus on standardized testing has whittled down school curriculum to “teach to the test.” She lamented the loss of a full school curriculum that includes arts, physical educa-tion, history, literature, science, mathematics and foreign languages. She also questioned the value of the tests themselves. If teachers and students cannot know what they got right or wrong, and only how they have done in comparison with other students, the test has no diagnostic value, she explained. “Unless the tests have diagnostic value, they have no value.” The remainder of Ravitch’s speech focused on the charter school industry and the threat she believes it poses to public education. She cited a long list of charter school scams and failing charter schools, and emphasized the danger in privatizing education. “Every dollar that goes to a charter school is a dollar taken away from a public school,” she said. “Can California really support two school systems — one that accepts all students and one that chooses its students and doesn’t get better results?” Ravitch offered suggestions on how to get the American public edu-cation system back on track, including leveling the playing field before children begin school by prioritizing prenatal care and high-quality early childhood education, reducing class sizes, providing a full and rich curriculum at every school, providing wraparound services — such as healthcare access, counselors and social services — at every school, and using tests diagnostically. To learn more about Diane Ravitch and her work, visit: . Gubernatorial candidates discuss education goals at AEC continued from page 1 tional needs should be the priority, not where they are being educated. Cox too stressed the importance of accountability. He said the private sector has a strong record of transparency and was generally open to charter schools. He also emphasized the need to change the Legislature in order to affect any change in the school system. “The [current Legislature] loves the control of the money they have that flows out of our pockets,” said Cox. Villaraigosa largely focused on opportunity and achievement gaps for students in underserved groups. He agreed with Eastin and Newsom on the vital importance of high-quality early childhood education for these students so that they don’t begin school already behind. The majority of the candidates did find common ground on boosting education spending — particularly through revisiting current property tax laws. Allen disagreed, arguing that all of the state’s taxes contrib-ute to the poverty of the state. “The bottom line is this is not a funding issue,” he stated, indicating poor school performance has more to do with accountability. Chiang referred to his record of prioritizing public schools throughout his term as state treasurer as an assurance that he would continue to fight for the education community. All of the candi-dates agreed on improving teacher pay and the need for local control of schools. Eastin also pointed to the need for more nurses, counselors and librarians and less reliance on standardized test scores. “You don’t fat-ten a hog by weighing it more often,” she said. “When we focus on our children ... we make better decisions.” Villaraigosa agreed: “Put the interest of students and kids first. Education gave me a shot. I want to give every kid that same shot.”

Previous Page  Next Page

Publication List
Using a screen reader? Click Here